Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Evan Zhu vs Adrian Andreev Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Zhu vs Andreev analysis and find out who is favored!
Evan Zhu vs Adrian Andreev Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Zhu 1 - 0 Andreev
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Zhu has won 37.04% of points on their second serve, while Andreev has won 50.52%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Zhu, in recent form, has won 45.14% of their opponent's second serve points, while Andreev has won 55.1%. The same stats for first serve returns are 33.27% and 34.73% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Zhu has saved 49.09% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Andreev has saved 54.58% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Zhu has won 42.55% of matches played (W/L 20/ 27), with Andreev winning 52.11% (W/L 37/ 34) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Zhu has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 70/ 47), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2). Andreev has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 110/ 68), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Zhu has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 33.33% of matches (W/L 10/ 20), where as Andreev has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 53.03% of matches (W/L 35/ 31). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Zhu winning 1 times and Andreev being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Zhu winning 2 and Andreev winning 1. The last match between Zhu and Andreev was at the Monterrey Challenger, 06-03-2022, Q1 round, Hard with Evan Zhu getting the victory 6-3 3-6 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:50:16.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Zhu and Andreev have played a deciding set 1 times, with Zhu winning 1 times and Andreev 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Zhu winning 0, and Andreev 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Zhu has played against opponents with an average rank of 289.72 while Andreev has played against players with an average rank of 325.15.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Zhu has won 44% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Andreev has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Zhu has converted 44.93% of breakpoint opportunities, and Andreev has converted 43.28% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
624
Rank
271
High
25
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
235
Rank
183
High
23
Age
R
Plays
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
Form
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
51% (199-195)
Career Total W/L
57% (174-133)
23% (3-10)
YTD W/L
57% (21-16)
$3,445
Career Prize Money
$98,110
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Evan Zhu | Adrian Andreev |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 15 | 12 |
| Aces (Total) | 6 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 8 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:50:16 | 1:50:16 |
| 1st Serve % | 55% (53/97) | 52% (43/82) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 79% (42/53) | 67% (29/43) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 39% (17/44) | 54% (21/39) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 44% (4/9) | 20% (3/15) |
| Return Points W% | 39% (32/82) | 39% (38/97) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 3-6 6-3 |
Stats 
Evan Zhu
Player
Adrian Andreev
55%
(
53 of
97)
1st Serve %
52%
(
43 of
82)
6
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
8
79%
(
42 of
53)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
39%
(
17 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
39%
(
38 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
32 of
82)
91
Total Points Won
88
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Evan Zhu | Adrian Andreev |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 23% (3/10) | 57% (21/16) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 30% (9/21) | 56% (49/38) |
| Games Win/Loss | 41% (112/162) | 52% (436/398) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 25% (2/6) | 64% (7/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 20% (1/4) | 61% (11/7) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 38% (3/5) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.19 | 0.21 |
| Aces Total | 25 | 85 |
| DFs per game | 0.71 | 0.14 |
| DFs Total | 95 | 56 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:39:15 | 1:55:54 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 163.77 | 372.51 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (552/903) | 67% (1758/2623) |
| 1st Serve W% | 65% (359/552) | 66% (1157/1758) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 37% (130/351) | 51% (437/865) |
| BPs Won% Total | 45% (31/69) | 43% (132/305) |
| Return Pts W% | 38% (335/882) | 42% (1166/2776) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 13% (1/7) | 57% (20/15) |
| Futures W/L | 40% (2/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 23% (3/13) | 57% (21/37) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (2/3) | 56% (5/9) |
| Deciding Set W% | 25% (1/4) | 46% (6/13) |
| 1st set W, W | 60% (5/3) | 85% (20/17) |
| 1st set W, L | 40% (5/2) | 15% (20/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (8/0) | 24% (17/4) |
Evan Zhu Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Wishaya Trongcharoenchaikul
Player
Evan Zhu
59%
(
55 of
94)
1st Serve %
54%
(
58 of
107)
1
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
11
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
40 of
58)
46%
(
18 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
19 of
49)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
39%
(
37 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
48 of
107)
105
Total Points Won
96
|
7-6(6) 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Evan Zhu
Player
Xing Dao Chen
53%
(
24 of
45)
1st Serve %
60%
(
30 of
50)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
88%
(
21 of
24)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
12 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
59
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yuquan Jin
Player
Evan Zhu
63%
(
61 of
97)
1st Serve %
56%
(
59 of
106)
5
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
8
72%
(
44 of
61)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
39 of
59)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
37%
(
36 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
43 of
106)
104
Total Points Won
99
|
4-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tomohiro Masabayashi
Player
Evan Zhu
49%
(
27 of
55)
1st Serve %
65%
(
40 of
62)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
8
67%
(
18 of
27)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
79%
(
22 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
15 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
62)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Oliver Anderson
Player
Evan Zhu
56%
(
57 of
102)
1st Serve %
64%
(
70 of
110)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
10
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
48 of
70)
56%
(
25 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
11 of
40)
39%
(
7 of
18)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
39%
(
40 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
51 of
110)
113
Total Points Won
99
|
6-7(5) 6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Evan Zhu
Player
Miles Clark
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve %
75%
(
49 of
65)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
32%
(
18 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
65)
69
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Karue Sell
Player
Evan Zhu
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve %
67%
(
41 of
61)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
64%
(
18 of
28)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
17 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
34 of
61)
65
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Juan Alejandro Hernandez
Player
Evan Zhu
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve %
58%
(
32 of
55)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
13 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
35
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Evan Zhu
Player
Jose Statham
62%
(
64 of
104)
1st Serve %
54%
(
58 of
108)
6
Aces
7
10
Double Faults
6
75%
(
48 of
64)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
37 of
58)
40%
(
16 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
38%
(
40 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
41 of
108)
105
Total Points Won
107
|
7-6(5) 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
James Kent Trotter
Player
Evan Zhu
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve %
60%
(
26 of
43)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
17 of
26)
79%
(
15 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
13 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
56
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Adrian Andreev Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Nerman Fatic
Player
Adrian Andreev
68%
(
50 of
74)
1st Serve %
68%
(
32 of
47)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
41%
(
30 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
65
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Adrian Andreev
Player
Genaro Alberto Olivieri
78%
(
39 of
50)
1st Serve %
73%
(
44 of
60)
0
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
59%
(
23 of
39)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
91%
(
10 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
60)
62
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Adrian Andreev
Player
Alibek Kachmazov
65%
(
52 of
80)
1st Serve %
58%
(
52 of
89)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
40 of
52)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
35 of
52)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
27 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
36 of
89)
89
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(10) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Giulio Zeppieri
Player
Adrian Andreev
58%
(
52 of
89)
1st Serve %
66%
(
54 of
82)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
27%
(
10 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
64%
(
7 of
11)
45%
(
40 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
42 of
82)
91
Total Points Won
80
|
4-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Adrian Andreev
Player
Denis Yevseyev
68%
(
66 of
97)
1st Serve %
70%
(
85 of
121)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
50 of
66)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
55 of
85)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
32%
(
31 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
48 of
121)
114
Total Points Won
104
|
3-6 6-4 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Roman Andres Burruchaga
Player
Adrian Andreev
61%
(
48 of
79)
1st Serve %
66%
(
46 of
70)
1
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
0
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
33%
(
26 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
27 of
70)
80
Total Points Won
69
|
7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Adrian Andreev
Player
Rodrigo Fernandes
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve %
73%
(
32 of
44)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
8%
(
1 of
12)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
16 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
58
Total Points Won
32
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Andrea Pellegrino
Player
Adrian Andreev
69%
(
83 of
120)
1st Serve %
57%
(
55 of
96)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
0
55%
(
46 of
83)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
54%
(
20 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
45%
(
54 of
120)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
42 of
96)
108
Total Points Won
108
|
6-3 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Adrian Andreev
Player
Darwin Blanch
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve %
69%
(
38 of
55)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
23%
(
9 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
59
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Billy Harris
Player
Adrian Andreev
67%
(
68 of
102)
1st Serve %
73%
(
77 of
106)
2
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
4
60%
(
41 of
68)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
51 of
77)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
41%
(
42 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
44 of
106)
104
Total Points Won
104
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Zhu Vs Andreev Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Adrian Andreev
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
